|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who goes to Japan ? | |||
| Man Utd |
   
|
25 | 59.52% |
| Chelsea |
  
|
17 | 40.48% |
| Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
01-05-2008, 09:36 AM
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
EA Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 13,498
|
yes of course...it's just that benq takes the club world cup way too seriously as a judgement of the strength of clubs from different continents...
you know his whole "south american teams are better than european teams just because they have won more club world cups" thing  |
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 08:22 PM
|
#34 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SW London, Uk
Age: 23
Posts: 507
|
Quote:
You fool, do your research before making stupid comments! Chelsea had previously played in the Champions League and recently won 2 FA cups a League cup and a Cup winners cup in the years running up to Abramovich's take over. They were an improving team who's league position improved every year. All Abramovich did was provide money to buy top players. JUST LIKE UNITED DO. It annoys me so much when people talk about how much Chelsea spend. Its just the same as United, but because half the country are glory hunting idiots nobody mentions it! Ferdinand £33m and Rooney £30m, Ronaldo £12m, Carrick £18m, Hargreaves £17m, Anderson £18m Nani £17m..... Its no different from what Chelsea have spent in recent seasons! Liverpool have spent just as much too, only they bought a bunch of turkeys! Chelsea have been a growing force in English football for the last 10 years! Now they're good enough to compete for the Championship everybodies jelous and just wants to pin their success on Abramovich's bank balance! You can buy the 11 most expensive most talented players in the world, but if they cant work well in a team together then they are useless. Give some credit to the team!
__________________
matt231985SR (PC) add!  |
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 08:25 PM
|
#35 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 21
Posts: 3,226
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 08:27 PM
|
#37 (permalink) | |
|
Elite
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,386
|
Quote:
afffffffffff just to make a different question instead of "who will win"
__________________
 |
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 08:32 PM
|
#38 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Guru
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Greater Manchester
Age: 20
Posts: 1,656
|
Quote:
  your success is thanks to Abramovic. By the way the people you listed that we bought, are thanks to the money we generated from the club (on=pitch success), not some stranger coming in and gifting us unlimited money I dont want to discuss this, not in the mood to read your long posts
__________________
Last edited by vivaronaldo; 01-05-2008 at 08:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 08:36 PM
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sitting on my computer chair chomping on gold fish.
Age: 13
Posts: 4,624
Blog Entries: 18
 |
^^^ true the only player on United worth more then 20 million pounds is ronaldo, the others just, you know aren't higher then world class.
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 08:36 PM
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 21
Posts: 3,226
|
Quote:
Remind me which club broke the transfer record numerous occassions over the last few decades? Robson, Andy Cole, Van Nistelrooy, Veron, Ferdinand, Rooney - even Mr Dennis Law back in the older days before our time... Did your youth system come free too? Without Roman we wouldn't be here no, but we'd still be Chelsea, contrary to popular belief we may have even avoided liquidation, but we are Chelsea an we are NOT Romans club. |
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 09:12 PM
|
#41 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Holland
Age: 15
Posts: 831
|
Quote:
Exaclty
__________________
Huntelaar Nasri Babel Sneijder Heitinga Valbuena Drenthe Sulejmani |
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 09:22 PM
|
#42 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Guru
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,383
|
Quote:
Manchester United have always been at the top of the attendance figures along with Liverpool, Everton, Tottenham and Arsenal, in fact no other team have finished top of the average attendance list in the last 50 seasons! Manchester United has been top more than any other team. |
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 09:53 PM
|
#43 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Age: 21
Posts: 3,226
|
Quote:
Top 20 Best Supported Clubs in the Premier League | EPL Talk Do you actually believe Manure have "generated their own money" or that it gives them right to slate Chelsea/Roman alike for doing it? I find it pathetic to be honest - we're made to feel like we're the enemy of football for spending big when Manure have done it for decades but they say "Oh it's alright, cause... we generated our own money"... sorry, but we faced either potential liquidation or Roman Abramovich - I know which one I would've taken had it come about, and thank **** we did get the right one, Bates nearly ****ed us cause he couldn't handle the debts he got us into. |
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 09:54 PM
|
#44 (permalink) | |
|
Elite
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,386
|
Quote:
maybe you have a "complex inferiority" because you know swedish football dont have impact to the world......... maybe in 58' only good thing that your country made in more than 100 years of football principally swedish clubs dont have impact in world and also in europe... so you like to attack south america clubs etc... and about numbers.... until 2006 south america had more number of world cups and until now more number of IC/WCC independently if you like or not...are official competitions not a friendly if SA clubs were too worst we didnt have 53% of IC/WCC and 50% of world cups if european football was so better i think......at least 70% of IC/WCC and 80% of world cups and if european clubs was so better or traditionals than SA clubs FIFA woulndt select about 50% of clubs from SA and others 50% from europe as the most traditionals clubs of world in all time if only european clubs were traditionals...i'd say... fifa wouldnt select any clubs from SA and when i say south american clubs...i'm saying from (argentina-brazil-uruguay).... since paraguay-chile-colombia are okay and the rest are crap like bolivia and venezuela they really suck and finally i just wrote "who goes to japan" only because to dont write "who will win" not because WCC is more important than UCL obvious UCL >>>>>>> WCC so it depends of your interpretation i imagined when i wrote "who goes to japan" that someone would contest my question now go back to the topic  and leave your complex inferioty
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 10:03 PM
|
#45 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Guru
|
Quote:
I think your boys get slated because of the sheer speed the money was spent, for pretty much a whole new squad, definitely a whole new team, apart from the likes of Terry and Lampard. Man Utd have built their money over decades, we're still run as a business, whereas Chelsea don't seem to be bothered by their financial losses... Peter 'Satan' Kenyon "We'll break even by 2010!"
__________________
RG Probably the best fifa player in Devon, definitely the best in Newton Abbot!! LTL Primera Table Man Utd Crystal Palace |
|
|
|
|
|
01-05-2008, 10:27 PM
|
#46 (permalink) | |
|
Forum Guru
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,383
|
Quote:
That list you've linked is only the amount of capacity filled as a percentage. Manchester United have had the highest average attendance in England every season since 1990. Since 1957, only Liverpool, Everton, Spurs and I think maybe Arsenal have only ever averaged a higher attendance. |
|
|
|
|
who is going to japan?
...nopelidopeley, they want to go to japan to play a friendly tournament 
