Manchester Utd X Chelsea official Thread - Page 2

Matieo10 · 01-05-2008, 04:20 AM

soo true.

AnfieldG8 · 01-05-2008, 07:43 AM

3 weeks, settle down kids.

Incendiere · 01-05-2008, 07:47 AM

Chelsea to win the Final 3-2.

Chelsea to win their last 2 games.

ManU to win it's first and choke on the 2nd.

Chelsea for the double.

.DJ · 01-05-2008, 09:10 AM

Man Utd

zzwampen · 01-05-2008, 09:31 AM

who is going to japan?

yeah, that's what they're playing for

not just to win the biggest club tournament in the world

...nopelidopeley, they want to go to japan to play a friendly tournament

.DJ · 01-05-2008, 09:33 AM

i dont think they r playin to get to japan either. They jus want to win UEFA CL trophy

zzwampen · 01-05-2008, 09:36 AM

yes of course...it's just that benq takes the club world cup way too seriously as a judgement of the strength of clubs from different continents...

you know his whole "south american teams are better than european teams just because they have won more club world cups" thing

DannyB · 01-05-2008, 06:02 PM

As long as we win the UCL I don't care. Obviouly I want to win the league, but I've seen us win it twice and I like skitting my Liverpool fan mates

Matt231985SR · 01-05-2008, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by benqbiggis

chelsea sucks

small team....

got strong because of abramovic

You fool, do your research before making stupid comments!

Chelsea had previously played in the Champions League and recently won 2 FA cups a League cup and a Cup winners cup in the years running up to Abramovich's take over.

They were an improving team who's league position improved every year. All Abramovich did was provide money to buy top players. JUST LIKE UNITED DO.

It annoys me so much when people talk about how much Chelsea spend. Its just the same as United, but because half the country are glory hunting idiots nobody mentions it!
Ferdinand £33m and Rooney £30m, Ronaldo £12m, Carrick £18m, Hargreaves £17m, Anderson £18m Nani £17m.....

Its no different from what Chelsea have spent in recent seasons! Liverpool have spent just as much too, only they bought a bunch of turkeys!
Chelsea have been a growing force in English football for the last 10 years! Now they're good enough to compete for the Championship everybodies jelous and just wants to pin their success on Abramovich's bank balance!
You can buy the 11 most expensive most talented players in the world, but if they cant work well in a team together then they are useless. Give some credit to the team!

ForeverBlue'86 · 01-05-2008, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt231985SR

You fool, do your research before making stupid comments!

Chelsea had previously played in the Champions League and recently won 2 FA cups a League cup and a Cup winners cup in the years running up to Abramovich's take over.

They were an improving team who's league position improved every year. All Abramovich did was provide money to buy top players. JUST LIKE UNITED DO.

It annoys me so much when people talk about how much Chelsea spend. Its just the same as United, but because half the country are glory hunting idiots nobody mentions it!
Ferdinand £33m and Rooney £30m, Ronaldo £12m, Carrick £18m, Hargreaves £17m, Anderson £18m Nani £17m.....

Its no different from what Chelsea have spent in recent seasons! Liverpool have spent just as much too, only they bought a bunch of turkeys!
Chelsea have been a growing force in English football for the last 10 years! Now they're good enough to compete for the Championship everybodies jelous and just wants to pin their success on Abramovich's bank balance!
You can buy the 11 most expensive most talented players in the world, but if they cant work well in a team together then they are useless. Give some credit to the team!

And we almost took the league in 99 if it weren't for that loathsome little ********** Guppy.

RevolutionMikE5 · 01-05-2008, 08:26 PM

Chelsea winning the leauge in 99? Wow, not quite.

benqbiggis · 01-05-2008, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzwampen

who is going to japan?

yeah, that's what they're playing for

not just to win the biggest club tournament in the world

...nopelidopeley, they want to go to japan to play a friendly tournament

afffffffffff

just to make a different question

instead of "who will win"

ViVaRooney · 01-05-2008, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt231985SR

You fool, do your research before making stupid comments!

Chelsea had previously played in the Champions League and recently won 2 FA cups a League cup and a Cup winners cup in the years running up to Abramovich's take over.

They were an improving team who's league position improved every year. All Abramovich did was provide money to buy top players. JUST LIKE UNITED DO.

It annoys me so much when people talk about how much Chelsea spend. Its just the same as United, but because half the country are glory hunting idiots nobody mentions it!
Ferdinand £33m and Rooney £30m, Ronaldo £12m, Carrick £18m, Hargreaves £17m, Anderson £18m Nani £17m.....

Its no different from what Chelsea have spent in recent seasons! Liverpool have spent just as much too, only they bought a bunch of turkeys!
Chelsea have been a growing force in English football for the last 10 years! Now they're good enough to compete for the Championship everybodies jelous and just wants to pin their success on Abramovich's bank balance!
You can buy the 11 most expensive most talented players in the world, but if they cant work well in a team together then they are useless. Give some credit to the team!

So you think you would be in this situation if Abramovic didnt come?

your success is thanks to Abramovic. By the way the people you listed that we bought, are thanks to the money we generated from the club (on=pitch success), not some stranger coming in and gifting us unlimited money

I dont want to discuss this, not in the mood to read your long posts

RevolutionMikE5 · 01-05-2008, 08:36 PM

^^^ true the only player on United worth more then 20 million pounds is ronaldo, the others just, you know aren't higher then world class.

ForeverBlue'86 · 01-05-2008, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vivaronaldo

So you thin you would be in this situation if Abramovic didnt come?

your success is thanks to Abramovic. By the way the people you listen that we bought are money we generated from the club, not some stranger coming in and gifting us unlimited money

I dont want to discuss this, not in the mood to read your long posts

How did United generate it? Did they click their fingers and build a massive fan base?

Remind me which club broke the transfer record numerous occassions over the last few decades? Robson, Andy Cole, Van Nistelrooy, Veron, Ferdinand, Rooney - even Mr Dennis Law back in the older days before our time... Did your youth system come free too?

Without Roman we wouldn't be here no, but we'd still be Chelsea, contrary to popular belief we may have even avoided liquidation, but we are Chelsea an we are NOT Romans club.

Jan · 01-05-2008, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzwampen

who is going to japan?

yeah, that's what they're playing for

not just to win the biggest club tournament in the world

...nopelidopeley, they want to go to japan to play a friendly tournament

Exaclty

COYS · 01-05-2008, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverBlue'86

How did United generate it? Did they click their fingers and build a massive fan base?

Manchester United have been the best supported team in England since the 1950's and 1960's it's not something that has only come about in the last ten years.

Manchester United have always been at the top of the attendance figures along with Liverpool, Everton, Tottenham and Arsenal, in fact no other team have finished top of the average attendance list in the last 50 seasons!

Manchester United has been top more than any other team.

ForeverBlue'86 · 01-05-2008, 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by COYS

Manchester United have been the best supported team in England since the 1950's and 1960's it's not something that has only come about in the last ten years.

Manchester United have always been at the top of the attendance figures along with Liverpool, Everton, Tottenham and Arsenal, in fact no other team have finished top of the average attendance list in the last 50 seasons!

Manchester United has been top more than any other team.

Dispell that one straight away:

Top 20 Best Supported Clubs in the Premier League | EPL Talk

Do you actually believe Manure have "generated their own money" or that it gives them right to slate Chelsea/Roman alike for doing it?

I find it pathetic to be honest - we're made to feel like we're the enemy of football for spending big when Manure have done it for decades but they say "Oh it's alright, cause... we generated our own money"... sorry, but we faced either potential liquidation or Roman Abramovich - I know which one I would've taken had it come about, and thank **** we did get the right one, Bates nearly ****ed us cause he couldn't handle the debts he got us into.

benqbiggis · 01-05-2008, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zzwampen

yes of course...it's just that benq takes the club world cup way too seriously as a judgement of the strength of clubs from different continents...

you know his whole "south american teams are better than european teams just because they have won more club world cups" thing

maybe you have a "complex inferiority" because you know swedish football dont have impact to the world.........

maybe in 58' only good thing that your country made in more than 100 years of football

principally swedish clubs dont have impact in world and also in europe...
so you like to attack south america clubs etc...

and about numbers.... until 2006 south america had more number of world cups and until now more number of IC/WCC

independently if you like or not...are official competitions not a friendly

if SA clubs were too worst we didnt have 53% of IC/WCC and 50% of world cups

if european football was so better i think......at least 70% of IC/WCC and 80% of world cups

and if european clubs was so better or traditionals than SA clubs FIFA woulndt select about 50% of clubs from SA and others 50% from europe as the most traditionals clubs of world in all time
if only european clubs were traditionals...i'd say... fifa wouldnt select any clubs from SA

and when i say south american clubs...i'm saying from (argentina-brazil-uruguay)....
since paraguay-chile-colombia are okay
and the rest are lalalala like bolivia and venezuela they really suck

and finally i just wrote "who goes to japan" only because to dont write "who will win"
not because WCC is more important than UCL
obvious UCL >>>>>>> WCC
so it depends of your interpretation

i imagined when i wrote "who goes to japan" that someone would contest my question

now go back to the topic

and leave your complex inferioty

Rgmonster · 01-05-2008, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverBlue'86

Dispell that one straight away:

Top 20 Best Supported Clubs in the Premier League | EPL Talk

.

You're putting more spin on it than a politician! Avg. attendance is still higher at OT than anywhere else, despite the percentage of seats with bums on!

I think your boys get slated because of the sheer speed the money was spent, for pretty much a whole new squad, definitely a whole new team, apart from the likes of Terry and Lampard. Man Utd have built their money over decades, we're still run as a business, whereas Chelsea don't seem to be bothered by their financial losses... Peter 'Satan' Kenyon "We'll break even by 2010!"

COYS · 01-05-2008, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverBlue'86

Dispell that one straight away:

Top 20 Best Supported Clubs in the Premier League | EPL Talk

Honestly mate it's true.

That list you've linked is only the amount of capacity filled as a percentage.

Manchester United have had the highest average attendance in England every season since 1990.

Since 1957, only Liverpool, Everton, Spurs and I think maybe Arsenal have only ever averaged a higher attendance.

ForeverBlue'86 · 01-05-2008, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by COYS

Honestly mate it's true.

That list you've linked is only the amount of capacity filled as a percentage.

Manchester United have had the highest average attendance in England every season since 1990.

Since 1957, only Liverpool, Everton, Spurs and I think maybe Arsenal have only ever averaged a higher attendance.

Ok nice one, any links to the actual stats?

benqbiggis · 01-05-2008, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt231985SR

You fool, do your research before making stupid comments!

Chelsea had previously played in the Champions League and recently won 2 FA cups a League cup and a Cup winners cup in the years running up to Abramovich's take over.

They were an improving team who's league position improved every year. All Abramovich did was provide money to buy top players. JUST LIKE UNITED DO.

It annoys me so much when people talk about how much Chelsea spend. Its just the same as United, but because half the country are glory hunting idiots nobody mentions it!
Ferdinand £33m and Rooney £30m, Ronaldo £12m, Carrick £18m, Hargreaves £17m, Anderson £18m Nani £17m.....

Its no different from what Chelsea have spent in recent seasons! Liverpool have spent just as much too, only they bought a bunch of turkeys!
Chelsea have been a growing force in English football for the last 10 years! Now they're good enough to compete for the Championship everybodies jelous and just wants to pin their success on Abramovich's bank balance!
You can buy the 11 most expensive most talented players in the world, but if they cant work well in a team together then they are useless. Give some credit to the team!

tell me now the world traditional in last century for chelsea

ForeverBlue'86 · 01-05-2008, 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by benqbiggis

tell me now the world traditional in last century for chelsea

Eh?

benqbiggis · 01-05-2008, 10:43 PM

buy many expensive and famous players dont make tradition

man utd is not traditional because they are richest team of world and spend lot of money like chelsea

01-05-2008, 04:20 AM	#26 (permalink)
Matieo10 EA Veteran Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Estádio do Dragão Gender: Private Posts: 19,158 Blog Entries: 3	soo true. __________________

01-05-2008, 07:43 AM	#27 (permalink)
AnfieldG8 Elite Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Brisbane (Aus) - Soon to be UK Age: 18 Gender: Male Posts: 6,117 Blog Entries: 2	3 weeks, settle down kids. __________________ Chelsea wherever you may be, keep your wives away from John Terry

01-05-2008, 09:10 AM	#29 (permalink)
.DJ Elite Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: GғӾ ңєдνэn Gender: Male Posts: 9,037	Man Utd __________________ DJ's Showcase Coming Soon...

01-05-2008, 09:31 AM	#30 (permalink)
zzwampen EA Veteran Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Sweden Posts: 15,654	who is going to japan? yeah, that's what they're playing for not just to win the biggest club tournament in the world ...nopelidopeley, they want to go to japan to play a friendly tournament __________________

01-05-2008, 09:33 AM	#31 (permalink)
.DJ Elite Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: GғӾ ңєдνэn Gender: Male Posts: 9,037	i dont think they r playin to get to japan either. They jus want to win UEFA CL trophy __________________ DJ's Showcase Coming Soon...

View Poll Results: Who goes to Japan ?
Man Utd	26	60.47%
Chelsea	17	39.53%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

01-05-2008, 07:47 AM	#28 (permalink)
Incendiere Forum Guru Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 1,274	Chelsea to win the Final 3-2. Chelsea to win their last 2 games. ManU to win it's first and choke on the 2nd. Chelsea for the double.

01-05-2008, 09:36 AM	#32 (permalink)
zzwampen EA Veteran Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Sweden Posts: 15,654	yes of course...it's just that benq takes the club world cup way too seriously as a judgement of the strength of clubs from different continents... you know his whole "south american teams are better than european teams just because they have won more club world cups" thing __________________

01-05-2008, 06:02 PM	#33 (permalink)
DannyB EA Veteran Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Burscough Age: 15 Gender: Male Posts: 24,614 Blog Entries: 9	As long as we win the UCL I don't care. Obviouly I want to win the league, but I've seen us win it twice and I like skitting my Liverpool fan mates __________________ He is Ezio Auditore da Firenze. He is an Assassin.

01-05-2008, 08:26 PM	#36 (permalink)
RevolutionMikE5 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Sitting on my computer chair chomping on gold fish. Age: 15 Posts: 4,741 Blog Entries: 18	Chelsea winning the leauge in 99? Wow, not quite.

01-05-2008, 08:36 PM	#39 (permalink)
RevolutionMikE5 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Sitting on my computer chair chomping on gold fish. Age: 15 Posts: 4,741 Blog Entries: 18	^^^ true the only player on United worth more then 20 million pounds is ronaldo, the others just, you know aren't higher then world class.

01-05-2008, 10:43 PM	#50 (permalink)
benqbiggis EA Veteran Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 12,705	buy many expensive and famous players dont make tradition man utd is not traditional because they are richest team of world and spend lot of money like chelsea __________________