FIWC - Players Winning 98% of their Games

The_ClayMan · 23-10-2009, 08:24 PM

Can someone please explain to me how the top FIWC players can win 98% of their games even after playing 400 games?

NZJ0KER · 23-10-2009, 08:27 PM

lack of quality opponents as showed by average opponent level. My AOL is higher than anyone in top 100 I don't see how thats possible.

The_ClayMan · 23-10-2009, 08:54 PM

good point; however,

there's still very good players who are low level, because either they don't care about their level or just bought the game, or other reasons.

it would seem that when someone plays 400 games, they'd encounter good players more than 2% of the time.

Also, one would think that EA would include the AOL in their ranking system to purge cheaters like that.

NZJ0KER · 23-10-2009, 09:07 PM

I see your point but these guys at the top are machines they rarely make mistakes or lose concentration which differientiates them from just plain good players.

lancerman2525 · 23-10-2009, 09:08 PM

because playing 400 games in 3 weeks is sad and they have very little life. i think anyone that played fifa that much would be good enough at the game to win 98% of games played. It doesnt matter who wins the online qualifiers as none of them would win a game heah to head at a tournament. i just wish we all had the amount of time to play fifa that the guys in the top 30 or 40 have.

online FIWC doesnt mean lalalala except for who can play fifa the most. if u want to qualify go to a live event and prove that u r better not that u have the most time.

HarryKeweIl · 23-10-2009, 09:09 PM

if you think there good come play me add Turkish delight

23-10-2009, 08:24 PM	#1 (permalink)
The_ClayMan Rookie Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 6	FIWC - Players Winning 98% of their Games Can someone please explain to me how the top FIWC players can win 98% of their games even after playing 400 games?

23-10-2009, 09:08 PM	#5 (permalink)
lancerman2525 Rookie Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Newcastle, Australia Posts: 267	because playing 400 games in 3 weeks is sad and they have very little life. i think anyone that played fifa that much would be good enough at the game to win 98% of games played. It doesnt matter who wins the online qualifiers as none of them would win a game heah to head at a tournament. i just wish we all had the amount of time to play fifa that the guys in the top 30 or 40 have. online FIWC doesnt mean lalalala except for who can play fifa the most. if u want to qualify go to a live event and prove that u r better not that u have the most time. __________________ PSN - commodore25

23-10-2009, 08:27 PM	#2 (permalink)
NZJ0KER Rookie Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 264	lack of quality opponents as showed by average opponent level. My AOL is higher than anyone in top 100 I don't see how thats possible.

23-10-2009, 08:54 PM	#3 (permalink)
The_ClayMan Rookie Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 6	good point; however, there's still very good players who are low level, because either they don't care about their level or just bought the game, or other reasons. it would seem that when someone plays 400 games, they'd encounter good players more than 2% of the time. Also, one would think that EA would include the AOL in their ranking system to purge cheaters like that.

23-10-2009, 09:07 PM	#4 (permalink)
NZJ0KER Rookie Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 264	I see your point but these guys at the top are machines they rarely make mistakes or lose concentration which differientiates them from just plain good players.

23-10-2009, 09:09 PM	#6 (permalink)
HarryKeweIl Banned Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 43	if you think there good come play me add Turkish delight