Database Feedback

[wrewicked]

Originally Posted by modbaraban

sorry then

no problem .
i look's like I'm the only one who's dissapointed with that

[asmircelic]

Please make some attention at the Swedish league! (allsvenskan), the line-up is wrong e.g Helsingborg, were henrik "henke" Larsson plays, a great player, use real stadiums in the swedish league, Luton Shelton in helsingborg is one of the fastest players, and Andreas Granqvist (now in wigan Athletics) are not at all good in manager mode! use more real faces!

PAY MORE ATTENTION AT SWEDISH LEAGUE!

PS. TRY TO MAKE MONHTLY LINE-UP UPDATES AND SO ON! DS.

[br0nkhorst]

??

[jascouk]

Jonathan Douglas and Tresor Kandol (now of Leeds United) have very low stats in the game. Please bring them more in line with the rest of the squad in the Jan update!

[ManUFan87P]

I know i am going to be a bit of a bugger, but if you think that someone is rated wrong, and you believe they havnt reached there peak like the game suggests, then you can edit the players that you feel need changing.

And i believe Rooney is rated a tad too high aswell. I mean come on, he isnt better then Henry, yet Rooney is rated 92, and Henry only 90.

The only thing i havnt had a problem with so far on the game is the prices of players. They aint ridicoulsly priced like in some manager games.

LMA for example, says Ferdinand is worth 40 million????
Yet on FIFA, you could get him for just over 12 Million

[HASSARD2004]

Originally Posted by EAUK_Protagonist

We're interested in your feedback regarding the database.

Is the data accurate enough? Are there any stats which are just plain wrong? Please remember that there will always be some personal opinion differences in how people believe players should be rated, so a 1-5 point difference in skill could be seen as a personal opinion.

Your feedback will be directed to the studio for consideration.

The Northern Ireland Natioonal Football Team Is Under Rated.
Only Two And A Half Stars

[wrewicked]

again the case of name troubles. I jecked my pc settings and I got all langueges avaible. but in scouted/youth players there still some missing letters. It looks like game creates players name only using englisz letters. just show what I write about.
some names with "local" letters that are in game from beggin.

and name of scouted player

[Whoot21Play]

2 players who should be on d j cambell nikalas bendtner

[thuda1991]

hell yeah...

[jameslewis10]

If EA read this....there are a lot of players that need to be added in the jan transfer window. I know you may think that no one's really bothered about the lower league squads, but when I find that my favourite team Peterborough still have players playing for them that left two years ago, and don't have regular first teamers such as Danny Crow and Mark Arber, it can be quite time consuming to have to create them. I think I might make a list of all the players not included that should be included in a seperate topic, as there's so many.

[modbaraban]

Originally Posted by jameslewis10

...I think I might make a list of all the players not included that should be included in a seperate topic, as there's so many.

that would be cool

[NickCaputo69]

Maybe add something in edit mode which allows us to change the name on the strip without editting the player name. even changing the player name dusnt always change the name on the strip, eg Cristiano Ronaldo was C. Ronaldo and i gave his first name Cristiano and surname Ronaldo and it sed C. Ronaldo on shirt still instead of Ronaldo like it should. applies to many players like Benjani Mwaruwari too. In real life its just Benjani on the shirt even tho his name is the above. it looks stupid in game wen over long names are on the shirt. dutch players like Van Nistelrooy have this issue when it shuld be V. Nistelrooy. and Pedersen at Blackburn, it Pedersen on his shirt not Gamst... i kno its minor but its still authentic too be correct. This option too change player shirt name could easily be added in the next patch as a bar under the player surname or name. Also fix it so the commentators still say player names when edited sats etc

[ShaunWPChelsea]

Eboue is way underrated.

Also, not being able to edit players and squads after theyve been downloaded online is annoying.

[meij42256]

After the update GK 'Ekramy Sherif' was added to the Feyenoord squad, this must be 'Sherif Ekramy'. Also he did not have a miniface...

[modbaraban]

Originally Posted by in another thread AKAnthony3

would be awsome if instead of having to start a career with all these transfers already done (i.e - install the patch and start a new campaign), that the game would automatically move them at the time of the Jan window, to make it more authentic.

So for examjple, Montella would be at Roma until Jan, at which point he moves automatically in the game to Fulham.

[goke313]

any update?

[himel7403]

Most defenders have a good free kick ability

[mitchythekid9]

Most serie A teams have no players with real faces or kits. For what was rated the top league in the world by the european boards of statics this is not acceptable.

[NickCaputo69]

readd the following faces into the game for the next squad patch

mutu, ibrahimovic, rio ferdinand and materazzi faces from fifa 05
rooney, robinho, drogba, tevez and adu from fifa world cup 06
chris sutton, sinama pongolle from fifa 06

[jimmayfc]

Portsmouth players (defence) is really underated.

All the goalkeepers are underated=Scott Carson-72???

[NickCaputo69]

yeh the english goalies should be altered compared to using cech/buffon as benchmarks who are 90/92

Robinson - 87
Foster - 85
James - 84
Carson - 82
Kirkland - 81

i think all other players should be compared to say the best player in the world for that position to so eg

Henry should be say 96 all other strikers should be scaled stat wise from that making Rooney 93, Drogba 92, Eto 92, Saha 88, Schevchenko 93, Robinho 91, Podolski 90, Crespo 92, Van Persie 90, Adriano 89, Darren Bent 90, Defoe 89, Mutu 86, Crouch 76... u get the idea

then for defenders like Nesta as 95 and then like John Terry 95 as the benchmarks, Ferdinand 94, Vidic 91, Cannavaro 93, G. Neville 88, A. Cole 89, Evra 88, Eboue 85, Micah Richards 84, Boulahrouz 87, Lucio 92, Ayala 91, Sergio Ramos 87, Marcelo 85, Roberto Carlos 90, Juan 86, Alex 87, Campbell 88 n Woodgate 86, Ouyol 93, Maldini 94, Stam 93, Materazzi 89...

midfielders... Gerrard and Ronaldinho 96 as the benchmark, Lampard 94, Cristiano Ronaldo 94, Scholes n Giggs 93, Robben 91, Messi 90, Deco 90, Carrick 92, Hargreaves 89, Ballack 94, Kaka 94, Gattuso 90, Pirlo 93, Mavuba 86, Diarra 88, Emerson 89, Nani 82, Maniche 86, Richardson 84....

goalies... Cech and Buffon 95, Cassilias (real madrid fella) 93, Van Der Sar 93, Kahn 90, Valdes 89, Lehmann 87, Robinson 87, Foster 85, Coupet 91, Barthez 85, Issakson 87, Given 88, Canizares 90, Reina 85, Craig Gordon 85, Culdicini 89, Hilario 83, Toldo 90...

therefore with ratings like this the growth as it is now is more realistic as Henry and co would reach 99, and in comparison other players wuld accuratly grow too, cuz lets face it the best footballer of today is Henry and 96 is close to 100 and in game hed get to 99, so wen others grow too it seems more accurate, so players only grow max of 3 points a season eg rooney 93-96... or sumfin u get me

[Golazo888]

~~~ Long post, so please read patiently and with an open mind ~~~

I think an area that deserves improvement is the inclusion of actual reserve and Youth Academy players. Take Liverpool, for example, you should see the likes of Paul Anderson, Danny Guthrie, Lee Peltier, Craig Lindfield, Stephen Darby, and Nabil El Zhar, among others. I'm sure all the Arsenal fans want to see more of their actual youth players in the game too.

These real names with best-estimate statistics should be pre-populated as Youth Academy players. From a production perspective, it makes more sense to start creating these real players early because they could eventually become first team regulars somewhere else in two or three years. But with that, you are also inviting more controversy regarding the accuracy of players, hehe.

I would also recommend increasing the frequency of minor injuries during Manager Mode (I think somebody has posted about this before). If these kinds of 1-6 week injuries (detected after the match) happen to more players, as a manager, you really get to come up with a rotation policy and would give your fringe players more opportunities to gain match experience and make the game more dynamic and interesting. Otherwise, once you build a good team with skillful players and good stamina, you can simply keep your starting 11 and quick sim most games, which is the boring thing to do.

Likewise, there should be more suspensions when you sim the games, so you have to rotate with more players. This should also force you to think about varying your formations based on the strengths and weaknesses of your players. Nothing against one-dimensional teams, but I think the game will have more depth when teams can be multi-dimensional. The good players and managers will figure out how to exploit one-dimensional teams.

The lack of quality reserves is what caused Aston Villa drop so many points mid-way through the season. Likewise, Chelsea dropped points when Cech, Terry, and Carvalho were out injured. On the other hand, the depth and quality of Arsenal's young players were capable of beating Liverpool in back-to-back cup games. These are the same kind of dynamics that we should be able to appreciate in Fifa 07.

[jimmayfc]

Originally Posted by NickCaputo69

yeh the english goalies should be altered compared to using cech/buffon as benchmarks who are 90/92

Robinson - 87
Foster - 85
James - 84
Carson - 82
Kirkland - 81

i think all other players should be compared to say the best player in the world for that position to so eg

Henry should be say 96 all other strikers should be scaled stat wise from that making Rooney 93, Drogba 92, Eto 92, Saha 88, Schevchenko 93, Robinho 91, Podolski 90, Crespo 92, Van Persie 90, Adriano 89, Darren Bent 90, Defoe 89, Mutu 86, Crouch 76... u get the idea

then for defenders like Nesta as 95 and then like John Terry 95 as the benchmarks, Ferdinand 94, Vidic 91, Cannavaro 93, G. Neville 88, A. Cole 89, Evra 88, Eboue 85, Micah Richards 84, Boulahrouz 87, Lucio 92, Ayala 91, Sergio Ramos 87, Marcelo 85, Roberto Carlos 90, Juan 86, Alex 87, Campbell 88 n Woodgate 86, Ouyol 93, Maldini 94, Stam 93, Materazzi 89...

midfielders... Gerrard and Ronaldinho 96 as the benchmark, Lampard 94, Cristiano Ronaldo 94, Scholes n Giggs 93, Robben 91, Messi 90, Deco 90, Carrick 92, Hargreaves 89, Ballack 94, Kaka 94, Gattuso 90, Pirlo 93, Mavuba 86, Diarra 88, Emerson 89, Nani 82, Maniche 86, Richardson 84....

goalies... Cech and Buffon 95, Cassilias (real madrid fella) 93, Van Der Sar 93, Kahn 90, Valdes 89, Lehmann 87, Robinson 87, Foster 85, Coupet 91, Barthez 85, Issakson 87, Given 88, Canizares 90, Reina 85, Craig Gordon 85, Culdicini 89, Hilario 83, Toldo 90...

therefore with ratings like this the growth as it is now is more realistic as Henry and co would reach 99, and in comparison other players wuld accuratly grow too, cuz lets face it the best footballer of today is Henry and 96 is close to 100 and in game hed get to 99, so wen others grow too it seems more accurate, so players only grow max of 3 points a season eg rooney 93-96... or sumfin u get me

good idea but of recent i'd say

James 85-86
Foster 83-84
Carson 82-83
Cudicini 84-85 (he's lost confidence)
Shevchecko 84-85 (he is not use to the premiership yet)
etc

[jimmayfc]

Originally Posted by NickCaputo69

yeh the english goalies should be altered compared to using cech/buffon as benchmarks who are 90/92

Robinson - 87
Foster - 85
James - 84
Carson - 82
Kirkland - 81

i think all other players should be compared to say the best player in the world for that position to so eg

Henry should be say 96 all other strikers should be scaled stat wise from that making Rooney 93, Drogba 92, Eto 92, Saha 88, Schevchenko 93, Robinho 91, Podolski 90, Crespo 92, Van Persie 90, Adriano 89, Darren Bent 90, Defoe 89, Mutu 86, Crouch 76... u get the idea

then for defenders like Nesta as 95 and then like John Terry 95 as the benchmarks, Ferdinand 94, Vidic 91, Cannavaro 93, G. Neville 88, A. Cole 89, Evra 88, Eboue 85, Micah Richards 84, Boulahrouz 87, Lucio 92, Ayala 91, Sergio Ramos 87, Marcelo 85, Roberto Carlos 90, Juan 86, Alex 87, Campbell 88 n Woodgate 86, Ouyol 93, Maldini 94, Stam 93, Materazzi 89...

midfielders... Gerrard and Ronaldinho 96 as the benchmark, Lampard 94, Cristiano Ronaldo 94, Scholes n Giggs 93, Robben 91, Messi 90, Deco 90, Carrick 92, Hargreaves 89, Ballack 94, Kaka 94, Gattuso 90, Pirlo 93, Mavuba 86, Diarra 88, Emerson 89, Nani 82, Maniche 86, Richardson 84....

goalies... Cech and Buffon 95, Cassilias (real madrid fella) 93, Van Der Sar 93, Kahn 90, Valdes 89, Lehmann 87, Robinson 87, Foster 85, Coupet 91, Barthez 85, Issakson 87, Given 88, Canizares 90, Reina 85, Craig Gordon 85, Culdicini 89, Hilario 83, Toldo 90...

therefore with ratings like this the growth as it is now is more realistic as Henry and co would reach 99, and in comparison other players wuld accuratly grow too, cuz lets face it the best footballer of today is Henry and 96 is close to 100 and in game hed get to 99, so wen others grow too it seems more accurate, so players only grow max of 3 points a season eg rooney 93-96... or sumfin u get me

good idea but of recent i'd say

James 85-86
Foster 82-84
Carson 82-84
Cudicini 84-85 (he's lost confidence)
Shevchecko 84-85 (he is not use to the premiership yet)
etc

[stankefa90]

Richards(striker) from Peterborough United(League Two) is Black(Afro-American) in real life,and in the game he is white...