100% Team Chemistry

GOGLEDDOLDRAIG · 17-03-2008, 08:11 PM

I have managed to obtain a chemistry of 90% but cant work out what needs to be done now. Its the second row who are the problem

Reddonpitt · 18-03-2008, 05:21 PM

Personally I think that Team Chemistry is insignificant- but I'm probably wrong. For instnace when I play as Ireland I change the back 3 which lowers the chemistry.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOGLEDDOLDRAIG

Its the second row who are the problem

I think I have seen a lock partnership once but I can't remember when.

I find that getting front row partenerships very easy, and sometimes 9, 10 or 10, 12 quite easy. For the back row it seems you need 3 players with 3 different skills.

TristanLomu · 18-03-2008, 07:42 PM

Assuming that chemistry is important, I've created my own team. Does this affect team chemistry?

Reddonpitt · 21-03-2008, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TristanLomu

Assuming that chemistry is important, I've created my own team. Does this affect team chemistry?

You would hope not, but there probably is a bug to do with that as well.

komodosp · 22-03-2008, 11:28 PM

How do you change team chemistry? Mine seems to be constantly at 40%

Reddonpitt · 23-03-2008, 06:19 PM

You will see it by the players with "chemistry" are highlighted green on the team selection screen.

For the front row it seems you only need three players in their preffred position (i.e not 2nd or 3rd) who have a high(ish) rating

Locks

on't know

Back Row: I used to think you needed three players with complimentary skills(That pic in the corneer by form and morale) but I'm not sure that they do if they have high ratings.

Half Backs: Just a good pairing(can also stretch to 12 on occasion if the 12 is a secondary 10 eg Catt, Giteau etc)

10,12: I'm not sure what this is dependant on.

12,13

Can start at 10) Not sure though I would imagine it needs a Henson/Shanklin or D'Arcy/O'Driscoll(from 2006 or 2007 6N) combination.

Back Three: Different skills-look at the Ireland team in the game to see what I mean(Kickie/Horgan/Dempsey). This is very hard to get- even if you have a back-three of S.Williams, Habana and Latham it would not have good chemistry because they don't have three different skills.

BUT team chemistry appears to have no affect on performance.

Hope that helps

TafIsObligde · 10-04-2008, 10:44 PM

I have had green for w - fb - w, I had M. Cueto, L. Mcdonaldand one M. Nonu respectively (was with Highlanders)

Tried one more time though and couldn't find them all together.

Reddonpitt · 13-04-2008, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TafIsObligde

I have had green for w - fb - w, I had M. Cueto, L. Mcdonaldand one M. Nonu respectively (was with Highlanders)

Tried one more time though and couldn't find them all together.

So i'm not going mad?

Iceyboy · 19-04-2008, 04:18 AM

I think i managed to get a second row pair with australia... it was with George Smith and another high rating lock.. either Shapre or mayb vickerman or harrison

Reddonpitt · 19-04-2008, 11:15 AM

I've now managed to get a lock pairing with France:

Nyanga (though in fact he is a flanker but can play lock)
Pelous

Seems that if you play a backrower there it helps (though I haven't noticed this with Jason White and can't imagine it works with Corry).

Maybe it's because both Smith and Nyanga are stars?

lavspurs · 05-06-2008, 02:19 AM

Does team chemistry actually make a difference to the play?!

CullenNZ · 17-07-2008, 09:37 PM

100% Team Chemistry ALL BLACKS (they still suck)

15 L Mcdonald
14 Nonu
13 Mills
12 Umaga
11 Rockocoko
10 N Evans
9 P Weepu
8 C Masoe
7 Mccaw
6 Collins
5 So'oialo
4 Jack
3 Hayman
2 Hore
1 Woodcock

weeks543 · 18-07-2008, 12:39 AM

That team is just a mix up of players, I'm not saying its bad that you got 100% team chemistry but I meen no carter in the team and you get 100%, it doesnt make sense to me.

muthabaloo · 18-07-2008, 05:58 AM

Lock is the problem position with team chemistry.

4. Any lock with a solid rating (E.g. Jack, Borthwick, Sharpe, Matfield)
5. So'oiolo, Nyanga, George Smith, Muller (SA lock)

These give you the green light (literally) for 100% TC.

17-03-2008, 08:11 PM	#1 (permalink)
GOGLEDDOLDRAIG Rookie Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 3	100% Team Chemistry I have managed to obtain a chemistry of 90% but cant work out what needs to be done now. Its the second row who are the problem

23-03-2008, 06:19 PM	#6 (permalink)
Reddonpitt Rookie Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 154	You will see it by the players with "chemistry" are highlighted green on the team selection screen. For the front row it seems you only need three players in their preffred position (i.e not 2nd or 3rd) who have a high(ish) rating Lockson't know Back Row: I used to think you needed three players with complimentary skills(That pic in the corneer by form and morale) but I'm not sure that they do if they have high ratings. Half Backs: Just a good pairing(can also stretch to 12 on occasion if the 12 is a secondary 10 eg Catt, Giteau etc) 10,12: I'm not sure what this is dependant on. 12,13Can start at 10) Not sure though I would imagine it needs a Henson/Shanklin or D'Arcy/O'Driscoll(from 2006 or 2007 6N) combination. Back Three: Different skills-look at the Ireland team in the game to see what I mean(Kickie/Horgan/Dempsey). This is very hard to get- even if you have a back-three of S.Williams, Habana and Latham it would not have good chemistry because they don't have three different skills. BUT team chemistry appears to have no affect on performance. Hope that helps

18-03-2008, 07:42 PM	#3 (permalink)
TristanLomu Rookie Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 6	Assuming that chemistry is important, I've created my own team. Does this affect team chemistry?

22-03-2008, 11:28 PM	#5 (permalink)
komodosp Rookie Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 27	How do you change team chemistry? Mine seems to be constantly at 40%

10-04-2008, 10:44 PM	#7 (permalink)
TafIsObligde Rookie Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 5	I have had green for w - fb - w, I had M. Cueto, L. Mcdonaldand one M. Nonu respectively (was with Highlanders) Tried one more time though and couldn't find them all together.

19-04-2008, 04:18 AM	#9 (permalink)
Iceyboy Rookie Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 2	I think i managed to get a second row pair with australia... it was with George Smith and another high rating lock.. either Shapre or mayb vickerman or harrison

19-04-2008, 11:15 AM	#10 (permalink)
Reddonpitt Rookie Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 154	I've now managed to get a lock pairing with France: Nyanga (though in fact he is a flanker but can play lock) Pelous Seems that if you play a backrower there it helps (though I haven't noticed this with Jason White and can't imagine it works with Corry). Maybe it's because both Smith and Nyanga are stars?

05-06-2008, 02:19 AM	#11 (permalink)
lavspurs Rookie Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 3	Does team chemistry actually make a difference to the play?!

17-07-2008, 09:37 PM	#12 (permalink)
CullenNZ Rookie Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 6	100% Team Chemistry ALL BLACKS (they still suck) 15 L Mcdonald 14 Nonu 13 Mills 12 Umaga 11 Rockocoko 10 N Evans 9 P Weepu 8 C Masoe 7 Mccaw 6 Collins 5 So'oialo 4 Jack 3 Hayman 2 Hore 1 Woodcock

18-07-2008, 12:39 AM	#13 (permalink)
weeks543 Rookie Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 111	That team is just a mix up of players, I'm not saying its bad that you got 100% team chemistry but I meen no carter in the team and you get 100%, it doesnt make sense to me.

18-07-2008, 05:58 AM	#14 (permalink)
muthabaloo Rookie Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 4	Lock is the problem position with team chemistry. 4. Any lock with a solid rating (E.g. Jack, Borthwick, Sharpe, Matfield) 5. So'oiolo, Nyanga, George Smith, Muller (SA lock) These give you the green light (literally) for 100% TC.