![]() |

|
|||||||
| Go to: | Battlefield | | | C&C | | | Dead Space | | | FIFA Series | | | Mirror's Edge | | | Need for Speed | | | Spore | | | The Sims |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7
|
I must say, that I am getting really tired of you MINMASTER... You have been parading around these forums, and others, like you ARE THE END ALL, KNOW ALL, FINAL SAY to 2142.
My first question is, how can you submit results to your POLL, and then expect the patch within a week after you submit the results? Second question... How many games do you know of that get a patch 3 years, after game is released? I can think of only 2, BF2, and 2142. The only patch you would get from Activision/Treyarch, would BE A NEW GAME THAT COSTS $65.00. Last question... If you LOVE THIS GAME, as much as it appears you do, can you learn to be patient, like everyone else? final advice, stop contradicting yourself.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 194
|
oh shut up, the patch was already in testing when my poll was being held.
let me turn the questions around: how many games do you know that have major issues like servers crashing after 3 years? not really acceptable imo. activision/treyarch doesn't mess up games and not fix it, otherwise there would be a huge outcry. the only reason 2142 outcry is so quiet is because the community is barely existent. COD MW isn't in need of a patch because the game runs very well. if i didn't care about the game, i wouldn't even comment about it in the forums. obviously, i do care and this is why i am campaigning for fixes. i have patience. the patch was announced nearly a year ago along with the screenshots of new map. after nearly a year, you would think people's patience is getting thin. either you have incredible patience or you're used to patches taking 1 year. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: KSA SAUDI ARABIA
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
look at this http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/10862882-post29.html oh BTW how do know that they are testing the PATCH????
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Forum Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,204
|
Baza, if you see this, I think it might be a really good time to pass comment.
__________________
RIP Debi "Albatross", 1990-2009 A kind, fun, warm person. Thanks for cheering me up when I really needed it. So very sad to learn that you're not here now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United States
Age: 30
Gender: Male
Posts: 13
|
Actually the game itself isnt so bad. Now if EA would crack a serious whip on Evenbalance (Punkbuster) and get them to do THEIR job right, the game would be more enjoyable.
__________________
Last edited by BigBadJames; 22-10-2009 at 03:44 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Age: 26
Gender: Male
Posts: 656
|
^ too right, getting kicked because pb crashes is annoying. Especially when you just get a blank box that saylalalalalaBUSTER and no other reasons for the kick. I remember when it messed up bad and caused stuttering because it kept scanning constantly stuff on your hdd. Took them more than a week to fix that.
__________________
![]() Now that's an explosion. |
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 14
|
You have to remember that 2142 is probably not on the very top of their priority list at the moment especially with 1943, Bad Company 2 and BF3 in development at the same time.
Also they said that they would work on it after the BF2 patch had been released, which was only a month and a half ago! If testing is going on as you said then they have probably done a few weeks internal testing, fixed some issues, outsourced it to a testing company for another couple of weeks, fixed some issues found in closed testing and are now either preparing it for open beta or release. These things don't happen over night, and since I still love this game I'm willing to wait for a while until its ready. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 38
|
Maybe they have 1 intern working on this patch 2 hours a day while sipping tea for lunch break?
Seriously, this game is dead for me. I can't believe I played it so much considering all the bugs (which have already been posted elsewhere) and the annoying server crashing / exploits. It's a miracle really... but I'm over it now. I barely play anymore... But really, the server crashing (through exploits or just regularly for no good reason) alone (nevermind the other bugs) is something which no other developer has left unpatched for so long (3 years after release), ever. Correct me if I'm wrong. This is a HUGE failure for Dice IMO. I'll look deep into 1943 / BC2 / BF3's server stability before even considering playing them at this point. I'm not putting up with another debacle like this, as fun as the new games might be. Waiting for 1943 / BC2 at this point and hoping they actually did a good job on the server stability this time. BTW whoever says we don't have patience is a bit confused (to say the least) imo. The mere fact that someone is even playing this game and even checking forums, hoping to see updates after 3 years of server crashing is more patience than I've ever seen anywhere else TBH. Last edited by HeatSurge; 22-10-2009 at 07:25 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
|
Quote:
![]() Take the ridiculously unacceptable kit selection problems you're no doubt familiar with and the pathetic attempt to fix it which did nothing at all. A pretty simple issue which, in the real software world (this is the irrelevant game world we're talking about here, let's recall) would be treated by managers like this: fix the problem in *your* software or lalalala and we'll find someone who can. So there are two possibilities, only: A. The game code was well-written, properly documented, always developed with future modification in mind. If true, and you can't figure it out, you're incompetent. B. Poorly written, undocumented code. If you write this type of software, you're incompetent (obviously). Two other points: Maybe the code is somewhere inbetween A&B. Well IMO, If it's not A, it's B. Secondly, perhaps there's like 1 person only still working on this and they can't possibly figure this out. Valid point.Lastly I feel I've wasted 15 min. discussing some old game that no one cares about anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) |
|
Forum Guru
Join Date: Jul 2008
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,204
|
I maintain that it's needlessly insulting to say that the devs are incompetent, though I respect the rigour with which you have argued otherwise.
He'd probably escape on skis like James Bond.
__________________
RIP Debi "Albatross", 1990-2009 A kind, fun, warm person. Thanks for cheering me up when I really needed it. So very sad to learn that you're not here now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
![]() One current standard coding practice is to re-use older code where possible to reduce time and cost. Generally most older code is poorly written and undocumented since coding standards were fairly fluid or non-existent till recently. Also consider that most of the older developers will have learned their trade when there wasn't any coding standards. Also writing documentation is really really dull. Calling them incompetent for this is very poor form to be honest. Coding is monotonous and can be quite difficult. Add in documentation for further monotony and yeah corners will be cut to get a good end product out in a reasonable timeframe. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
© 2008 Electronic Arts Inc. All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy - UPDATED | Terms of Service | Pegi Info
Electronic Arts Limited, Onslow House, Onslow Street, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 4TN United Kingdom
Registered in England and Wales; Registered Number: 2057591