Operation Blue Pearl Feedback - Page 11

loserke14 · 21-05-2009, 12:35 PM

what about giving usmc a blackhawk?

globefish23 · 21-05-2009, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loserke14

what about giving usmc a blackhawk?

Without any AA sites on the map and the BH's newly beefed up gatling guns?
That would be a massacre against the PLA side.

No, leave it as it is:
A city map with close quarter fighting in some parts and armor fighting in others.
Also, airborne transportation would disrupt the whole beach landing scenario.

1Bryce1 · 21-05-2009, 05:44 PM

The only thing it needs is a PLA uncap. The flags are way to close not to have one and they get capped out almost every game I've played.

globefish23 · 22-05-2009, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1Bryce1

The only thing it needs is a PLA uncap. The flags are way to close not to have one and they get capped out almost every game I've played.

Well, I guess that's because on this map everyone plays the PLA side as if the rear flag was an uncap, rushing out and concentrating on the other flags.
No surprise they'll get stabbed in the back with their own tank.

People should try and protect it, as it's a quite important spawnpoint with a tank and APC and also the commander assets.
And cutting the two bridges is not enough defence.

PlayVnm6 · 22-05-2009, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1Bryce1

Really PlayVnm6? Are you a landscape designers? Is it that critical that every freakin plant get moved around to suit your liking?

No? But does it look normal that plants are half way in the wall? Guess not! Its something what can be fixed and yeah i dont saw issues like this in Cod4. Maybe there are glitches but you dont see them like here.

pahkiller · 23-05-2009, 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PlayVnm6

No? But does it look normal that plants are half way in the wall? Guess not! Its something what can be fixed and yeah i dont saw issues like this in Cod4. Maybe there are glitches but you dont see them like here.

Absolutelycorrect there are a fair fewglitch;s
In BF2 where there are not in other games e.g. COD

Insanityyyy · 23-05-2009, 10:58 AM

I have to say that further improvements should be done, nothing big but atleast make it possible to go around the defense close to Market (Going left instead of in the middle).

loudballs · 25-05-2009, 09:30 AM

add mounted machine guns to the us sandbag towers to help prevent base rape !!!!!

globefish23 · 25-05-2009, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loudballs

add mounted machine guns to the us sandbag towers to help prevent base rape !!!!!

That's a good point actually.

The US base doesn't seem to have any mounted defences at all, yet the PLA could attack it with boats and even APCs.

Some machine gun nests would really help.
One of them should be in the hangar where the APCs are parked.
Some should be outside covering the ramps to the water.

TOW missiles could be a problem though, as they could be fired across the water towards the temple flag.

Insanityyyy · 25-05-2009, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loudballs

add mounted machine guns to the us sandbag towers to help prevent base rape !!!!!

Agreed, that and a TOW for defense against APCs on vehicle maps!

Tiuri20000 · 25-05-2009, 05:18 PM

I must say i like defending the PLA main base. Some mines under the bridge has given me lots of kills!

Same thing with USMC main base, some mines on the ramps and any landing RIB/APC gets blown to bits.

Ow yeah, its possible to use a RIB to go under the second bridge, don't know if that should be in the map design?

NLaiDao · 25-05-2009, 07:30 PM

Just replace the LMG on RIB's with .50 Cal's. It is far from uncommon in reallife, and would improve gameplay. Boats will be less vulnerable to individual AT soldiers and will get raped less by air assets on wake island. In general they make beach assaults more viable and there is no need to worry about them being overpowered weapon platforms since they cannot be taken inland and on practically all maps geography and-or structures prevent deep inland covering.

Edit: in fact this might be thé solution to the wake air dilemma as nothing gets boosted or nerfed, but the USMC, when they work together, will be better able to prevent baserape (patrol in a 3 RIB group in front of the carrier).

acid343211 · 25-05-2009, 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loserke14

what about giving usmc a blackhawk?

I did already suggested this Baza at dice stated the reason they can't i don't remember which thread its on.

The-APC-Driver · 25-05-2009, 11:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiuri20000

I must say i like defending the PLA main base.
Same thing with USMC main base, some mines on the ramps and any landing RIB/APC gets blown to bits.

... aswell as your own USMC apcs trying to leave the base ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by acid343211

I did already suggested this Baza at dice stated the reason they can't i don't remember which thread its on.

think it had something to do w/ drawcalls

ChaeI · 26-05-2009, 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NLaiDao

Just replace the LMG on RIB's with .50 Cal's. It is far from uncommon in reallife, and would improve gameplay. Boats will be less vulnerable to individual AT soldiers and will get raped less by air assets on wake island. In general they make beach assaults more viable and there is no need to worry about them being overpowered weapon platforms since they cannot be taken inland and on practically all maps geography and-or structures prevent deep inland covering.

Edit: in fact this might be thé solution to the wake air dilemma as nothing gets boosted or nerfed, but the USMC, when they work together, will be better able to prevent baserape (patrol in a 3 RIB group in front of the carrier).

I support this completely; boats are practically defenseless. Due to a lack of traction the boats will continue to move for quite some time after input has ceased, and therefore any weapons fired from them will suffer severe accuracy penalties. Replacing the .30 with a .50 would do wonders; it may actually make the boats worthy of sharing a category with the FAV and DPV.

On a different note: I don't know if anyone has mentioned this yet (I'm not going to read this whole thread, sorry), but if a player drives a boat or APC under the low bridge on OBP he can shoot through the bridge and kill players. It works from all the positions on a boat so players could even shoot rockets and throw grenades through it. The advantage isn't huge, but it should probably be fixed.

DTFLionHeart · 26-05-2009, 01:27 PM

Hi guys, I have a question about battlefield Special Forces, I don't know if it is a game bug.
When inside a vehicle, (helicopter, tank...) is it possible to enable and disable night vision?.
Because outside them I can enable and disable it but inside a vehicle, It does not work. I can switch between them.
Is it a bug that can easily be repaired?.

Has anyone had the same problem?
Thanks guys.

Galslacht21 · 26-05-2009, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTFLionHeart

Hi guys, I have a question about battlefield Special Forces, I don't know if it is a game bug.
When inside a vehicle, (helicopter, tank...) is it possible to enable and disable night vision?.
Because outside them I can enable and disable it but inside a vehicle, It does not work. I can switch between them.
Is it a bug that can easily be repaired?.

Has anyone had the same problem?
Thanks guys.

jezus,,,,wrong topic dude. Damn noobs.

DTFLionHeart · 26-05-2009, 02:59 PM

Sorry, youre right. My mistake

Tiuri20000 · 26-05-2009, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The-APC-Driver

... aswell as your own USMC apcs trying to leave the base ...

That depends on the server setting, friendly fire on or off for mines.

In all, it works, so i do not really see the problem defending the base, of course the keyword for successful defense is: Teamwork

The-APC-Driver · 26-05-2009, 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiuri20000

That depends on the server setting, friendly fire on or off for mines.

true, the noobs never care about that though

another thing that bugs me is that the chinese team would have to leave a tank behind to defend their main 24/7 incase the USMC have the brilliant idea to move all their apcs back there

Gerg0r · 26-05-2009, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The-APC-Driver

true, the noobs never care about that though

another thing that bugs me is that the chinese team would have to leave a tank behind to defend their main 24/7 incase the USMC have the brilliant idea to move all their apcs back there

The PLA tanks actually prevent that most of the time by standing on the ramp at Old Square. It's the only place for them to do anything if the market and temple are defended well by ATs. Not to mention the PLA apc is in the water there, too.

Tiuri20000 · 26-05-2009, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PlayVnm6

Could you make the oob line outside the green? Boats could go that way to the back. Another point what could make the US give a chance to land.

Final oob lines from the map OBP. It wouldnt make the gameplay different that much.

This change to the map still looks interesting, i like the idea of the canals with boats racing trough them.
However having boats and APC's storming the PLA from multiple sides defeats the beach landing idea. Which does not seem to work out to well, most of the time.
Maybe combining it with the PLA main base being an uncap?

Gerg0r · 26-05-2009, 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tiuri20000

Maybe combining it with the PLA main base being an uncap?

Don't you think they already have enough advantages on this map?

The canals can easily be blocked by one engineer... one mine or two and no boat will be able to get through.

ChaeI · 26-05-2009, 11:07 PM

That South canal is a little bit glitchy; The bridge is too low. I'd love to have it open, but the bridge would have to be moved/swaped/modified.

I removed the combat area to check out the whole map and it's pretty neat. Some places are really bland but it sure is interesting.

acid343211 · 27-05-2009, 04:39 AM

The Temple flag i believe was already stated by Baza that it will be changed no need to go over this again.

21-05-2009, 05:44 PM	#253 (permalink)
1Bryce1 Forum Junkie Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: "SF Bay Area" San Jose, California Gender: Male Posts: 2,761	The only thing it needs is a PLA uncap. The flags are way to close not to have one and they get capped out almost every game I've played. __________________ PSN: x1BrYcE1x Join PS3 Beta Group

25-05-2009, 09:30 AM	#258 (permalink)
loudballs Rookie Join Date: May 2009 Location: U.S.A. Gender: Private Posts: 86	add mounted machine guns to the us sandbag towers to help prevent base rape !!!!! Last edited by loudballs; 25-05-2009 at 09:55 AM..

25-05-2009, 05:18 PM	#261 (permalink)
Tiuri20000 Rookie Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 127	I must say i like defending the PLA main base. Some mines under the bridge has given me lots of kills! Same thing with USMC main base, some mines on the ramps and any landing RIB/APC gets blown to bits. Ow yeah, its possible to use a RIB to go under the second bridge, don't know if that should be in the map design? Last edited by Tiuri20000; 25-05-2009 at 06:09 PM..

25-05-2009, 07:30 PM	#262 (permalink)
NLaiDao Rookie Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 157	Just replace the LMG on RIB's with .50 Cal's. It is far from uncommon in reallife, and would improve gameplay. Boats will be less vulnerable to individual AT soldiers and will get raped less by air assets on wake island. In general they make beach assaults more viable and there is no need to worry about them being overpowered weapon platforms since they cannot be taken inland and on practically all maps geography and-or structures prevent deep inland covering. Edit: in fact this might be thé solution to the wake air dilemma as nothing gets boosted or nerfed, but the USMC, when they work together, will be better able to prevent baserape (patrol in a 3 RIB group in front of the carrier). Last edited by NLaiDao; 25-05-2009 at 07:32 PM..

27-05-2009, 04:39 AM	#275 (permalink)
acid343211 Rookie Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 82	The Temple flag i believe was already stated by Baza that it will be changed no need to go over this again. __________________ Planning On Buying A Game Server, Consider Clicking My Referral Link http://www.gameservers.com/?ref=1629589

21-05-2009, 12:35 PM	#251 (permalink)
loserke14 Rookie Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Belgium Posts: 55	what about giving usmc a blackhawk?

23-05-2009, 10:58 AM	#257 (permalink)
Insanityyyy Forum Guru Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Skellefteå, Sweden Gender: Male Posts: 1,032	I have to say that further improvements should be done, nothing big but atleast make it possible to go around the defense close to Market (Going left instead of in the middle).

26-05-2009, 01:27 PM	#266 (permalink)
DTFLionHeart Rookie Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 4	Hi guys, I have a question about battlefield Special Forces, I don't know if it is a game bug. When inside a vehicle, (helicopter, tank...) is it possible to enable and disable night vision?. Because outside them I can enable and disable it but inside a vehicle, It does not work. I can switch between them. Is it a bug that can easily be repaired?. Has anyone had the same problem? Thanks guys.

26-05-2009, 02:59 PM	#268 (permalink)
DTFLionHeart Rookie Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 4	Sorry, youre right. My mistake

26-05-2009, 11:07 PM	#274 (permalink)
ChaeI Rookie Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 80	That South canal is a little bit glitchy; The bridge is too low. I'd love to have it open, but the bridge would have to be moved/swaped/modified. I removed the combat area to check out the whole map and it's pretty neat. Some places are really bland but it sure is interesting.