Quote:
Originally Posted by 406NotAcceptable
Well I am sure everyone here would be pleased if EA would promise a 360 port. Somehow I feel the 'I told you so' will be on the other foot...
|
Hell, yeah! If NG was ported to PC, it would be introduced to the wonderful world of modding!
Quote:
1-3% including office PC's with no graphics card, maybe, but for people who play games on their PC (the market the game is aimed at), more than 1-3% will have capable PC's. Going by your judgement, CoD4 etc wouldn't have been best-sellers on PC because only 1-3% of could play it...
I built a Core 2 Duo, DX10 capable computer, including graphics card, motherboard and CPU for £222 a while ago. It'd probably cost £150 or less now.
|
Exactly! We're talking real PCs here, not mickey mouse office PCs! Even my college lecturer called the PCs there mickey mouse! Real PCs, EA. Real PCs for real gamers, that's what games are for. GAMERS!
This has got to be the worst excuse for not doing something in the history of gaming.
Quote:
Ahh this rubbish again.
Fun examples, from the past:
Oblivion (2007):
CPU: AI system dealing with 1500+ NPCs.
GPU: Many aspects of the game ended up being scaled down for the XBox 360 release.
Football Manager 2008 (2007)
CPU: XBox version limited to 10 leagues and 3 countries. PC unlimited.
General Benchmarks (2006)
PS3 processor runs slower than an early Apple Mac G5 from 2003!
hxxp://www.geekpatrol.ca/2006/11/playstation-3-performance/
Other stuff:
Mass Effect, better on the PC.
Gears of War, better on the PC.
Doom 3, better on the PC.
Bioshock, better on the PC.
The Orange Box, better on the PC.
Call of Juarez, better on PC.
Beware only 1-3% of current PCs have the CPU power required to read this post.
|
EXACTLY! EA, games get dumbed down for consoles. NOT FOR BLOODY PCs! What does that tell you??
Edit: You forgot all the GTA games. Miles better on PC!