Hmmm yes I posted up a new thread relating to how EA could easily change its algorithm to reflect who the actual best players are. Why did i post it:
1. Top ranked players getting negative scores in the real games and you all know what I mean by real games lol.
2. Players claiming they are great cause they can go into games with a strong attack and sit back with a sniper rifle picking off whats going on where the real speed of reaction is going by the enemy's flag where you have to take on several at once and dodge grenades.
3. Players who boast but youll only ever see do well in one map cause thats the only place they can hack it.
Guys everyone whos good apart from a couple talks these days and if you fall into any of the above trust me it sticks out like a sore thumb and you get laughed at.
Do me this favour think of a top player then think when was the last time you saw them running back with a flag? Anyone can take the easy kills but you need to realise everyone sees it and everyone chats in the main chat boxes. Fighting in the rear and up to midway is easy but charging through the enemy on their ground taking out several on the way in and serveral on the way out gets you noticed and respect.
To me EA's current system of ranking is rubbish as justified by the amount of negative scores by top players in hard games with an overall unbelievably high score/rank, or maybe im wrong and they were just happening to have a bad day every time i saw them play hmmmmmmmm.
Problem is guys everyone chats these days and everyone knows who you are. Thats the problem with achieving top dog all the other dogs suddenly start watching you and notices if youre not quite as good as youd like everyone to think you are!
Fully1967
|