Quote:
Originally Posted by zzwampen
yes of course...it's just that benq takes the club world cup way too seriously as a judgement of the strength of clubs from different continents...
you know his whole "south american teams are better than european teams just because they have won more club world cups" thing  |
maybe you have a "complex inferiority" because you know swedish football dont have impact to the world.........
maybe in 58' only good thing that your country made in more than 100 years of football
principally swedish clubs dont have impact in world and also in europe...
so you like to attack south america clubs etc...
and about numbers.... until 2006 south america had more number of world cups and until now more number of IC/WCC
independently if you like or not...are official competitions not a friendly
if SA clubs were too worst we didnt have 53% of IC/WCC and 50% of world cups
if european football was so better i think......at least 70% of IC/WCC and 80% of world cups
and if european clubs was so better or traditionals than SA clubs FIFA woulndt select about 50% of clubs from SA and others 50% from europe as the most traditionals clubs of world in all time
if only european clubs were traditionals...i'd say... fifa wouldnt select any clubs from SA
and when i say south american clubs...i'm saying from
(argentina-brazil-uruguay)....
since paraguay-chile-colombia are okay
and the rest are lalalala like bolivia and venezuela they really suck
and finally i just wrote "who goes to japan" only because to dont write "who will win"
not because WCC is more important than UCL
obvious UCL >>>>>>> WCC
so it depends of your interpretation
i imagined when i wrote "who goes to japan" that someone would contest my question
now go back to the topic 
and leave your complex inferioty